Advocate, Inc. dba Nava Benefits
Advocate, Inc. dba Nava Benefits collected $447,338 in commissions and fees from 9 employer health plans in plan year 2024 filings, ranking #967 among 12,126 brokers named in the public record. Most of its named clients are in California.
Largest clients
Employers whose filings reported the most compensation to this broker.
| Employer | Paid to broker | Participants |
|---|---|---|
| Best Formulations, Inc. · California | $222,099 | 417 |
| Umbra Lab, Inc. · California | $84,456 | 116 |
| Remote Technology Services Inc. · California | $71,370 | 1,055 |
| Inventure Capital Corporation dba Tala · California | $30,610 | 128 |
| Ellison Technologies, Inc. · California | $21,677 | 332 |
| RRM Design Group, Inc. · California | $6,942 | 181 |
| Warp Drive, Inc · California | $6,905 | 142 |
| Valley Achievement Center · California | $1,653 | 104 |
| The Raymond Group · California | $1,626 | 125 |
Source: DOL Form 5500 Schedule A Part I, plan year 2024, grouped by broker name as filed. Dataset built October 24, 2026.
Where its clients are
Employer plans naming this broker, by employer state.
How much does Advocate, Inc. dba Nava Benefits earn from employer health plans?
In plan year 2024 filings, employers reported paying Advocate, Inc. dba Nava Benefits $447,338: $413,545 in commissions and $33,793 in fees, across 21 insurance contracts at 9 employers. That ranks #967 of 12,126 brokers in the public record.
What commission rate is paid on plans Advocate, Inc. dba Nava Benefits brokers?
Not enough fully insured medical plans name Advocate, Inc. dba Nava Benefits as the sole broker to compute a stable rate. The national median is 3.8% of premium.
Which employers use Advocate, Inc. dba Nava Benefits?
The largest reported payers in 2024 were Best Formulations, Inc., Umbra Lab, Inc., Remote Technology Services Inc.. California is its biggest state by employer count (9 plans).
Amounts are what employers reported on their own filings. They do not include compensation from carriers that is not tied to a specific contract, and names are grouped exactly as filed, so related entities can appear separately. How this record is built.